Hello Superstars,
It is not a surprise that women and men think differently. Women, the more relatable and soft (but not weak) gender, are known for thinking based on emotion. They put themselves in other people's shoes. We think about how not only ourselves would be affected, but how everyone involved would be affected. Men are known for thinking with what they have between their legs. Either gender's way of thinking prevents them from doing certain things. For women, putting their emotions first sometimes prevents us from being assigned a high leadership role. Men's way of thinking can lead them to temptation and prevent them from being a good leader or man in general.
I feel that our minds are powerful, and should think beyond borders. As a blogger, I want my viewers to think. Here are two scenarios I would like to leave you with to better express how I feel with the way genders think.
Let's say you have a female who is the director of a well-known, locally owned facility. The facility has been partners with the top private school in town for years. It even grants a $10,000 scholarship to a student of the school that meets the requirements. A high school student, let's call her Rebecca, files papers and does other assistant duties in the facility's office. One day Rebecca comes across an ad for the scholarship. She goes to the director and asks more about the free money she could earn. "You see you're not qualified to receive this scholarship, since you don't attend the school," the director tells her. Hiding her disappointment, Rebecca excuses herself to return to her work. The director senses something is wrong and wants to know more about Rebecca's interest in the scholarship. "Well, I kind of have to pay for college myself. My parents are having a hard time making ends meet."The director takes this information into consideration. She knows the students at the private school have had money set aside for their college tuition since before their existence. Maybe one year the school can go without the scholarship."I see what I could do," she tells Rebecca.
Is it wrong that this female let her emotions get involved.
An elite law firm has just posted internship opening. This opening is only opened for one law hopeful. One of the leading attorneys at the firm is over the interview and hiring process. There are two candidates. Both female. One graduated from a top in state school. She has completed hours of community service, even while she studied aboard. If she got the internship, this would be her second year of experience. Meet the second candidate, a graduate of a standard in state school. She has community service hours, but not as much as the other. Her only experience in law comes from her studies in college and from what her father has told her of his cases. You would think the first candidate would get the internship. Sadly, she didn't. The lawyer chose the second candidate because he thought she was more "socially attractive". According to him, her long well kept hair and tailored suits was what he considered more professional than the first candidate's short bob (she decided to cut her hair after a time in the hot Africa sun) and Target work clothes she made to the best of her abilities look department store bought.
Please comment with the way feel about the scenarios or on how you feel with the way genders think.
Love ya,
Sarah E.
It is not a surprise that women and men think differently. Women, the more relatable and soft (but not weak) gender, are known for thinking based on emotion. They put themselves in other people's shoes. We think about how not only ourselves would be affected, but how everyone involved would be affected. Men are known for thinking with what they have between their legs. Either gender's way of thinking prevents them from doing certain things. For women, putting their emotions first sometimes prevents us from being assigned a high leadership role. Men's way of thinking can lead them to temptation and prevent them from being a good leader or man in general.
I feel that our minds are powerful, and should think beyond borders. As a blogger, I want my viewers to think. Here are two scenarios I would like to leave you with to better express how I feel with the way genders think.
Let's say you have a female who is the director of a well-known, locally owned facility. The facility has been partners with the top private school in town for years. It even grants a $10,000 scholarship to a student of the school that meets the requirements. A high school student, let's call her Rebecca, files papers and does other assistant duties in the facility's office. One day Rebecca comes across an ad for the scholarship. She goes to the director and asks more about the free money she could earn. "You see you're not qualified to receive this scholarship, since you don't attend the school," the director tells her. Hiding her disappointment, Rebecca excuses herself to return to her work. The director senses something is wrong and wants to know more about Rebecca's interest in the scholarship. "Well, I kind of have to pay for college myself. My parents are having a hard time making ends meet."The director takes this information into consideration. She knows the students at the private school have had money set aside for their college tuition since before their existence. Maybe one year the school can go without the scholarship."I see what I could do," she tells Rebecca.Is it wrong that this female let her emotions get involved.
An elite law firm has just posted internship opening. This opening is only opened for one law hopeful. One of the leading attorneys at the firm is over the interview and hiring process. There are two candidates. Both female. One graduated from a top in state school. She has completed hours of community service, even while she studied aboard. If she got the internship, this would be her second year of experience. Meet the second candidate, a graduate of a standard in state school. She has community service hours, but not as much as the other. Her only experience in law comes from her studies in college and from what her father has told her of his cases. You would think the first candidate would get the internship. Sadly, she didn't. The lawyer chose the second candidate because he thought she was more "socially attractive". According to him, her long well kept hair and tailored suits was what he considered more professional than the first candidate's short bob (she decided to cut her hair after a time in the hot Africa sun) and Target work clothes she made to the best of her abilities look department store bought.
Please comment with the way feel about the scenarios or on how you feel with the way genders think.
Love ya,
Sarah E.
No comments :
Post a Comment